While VGSO operates in a sector which attracts a predominantly female workforce - and many of its findings reflect broader trends in the legal profession - the audit points to a number of underlying causes of gender inequality within the organisation.
The most significant structural driver of gender inequality identified through the audit is the unequal distribution of men and women across occupational groups. Women are over-represented in lower-paying Clerical and Administrative roles, while men are over-represented in higher-paying Manager and Senior Leadership positions relative to their share of the overall workforce. This occupational segregation is the primary factor contributing to VGSO's overall mean gender pay gap.
Alongside occupational segregation, the audit points to potential inconsistencies in remuneration decision-making as a contributing factor to gender pay disparities. This includes the possibility of gendered variance in starting salaries for external versus internal appointments, and potential inconsistency in remuneration decisions across branches for identical or similar roles. While existing People and Culture oversight mechanisms provide a degree of safeguard, these areas require closer monitoring and shared accountability with hiring managers to ensure remuneration decisions are consistently equitable across the organisation.
Audit data consistently shows women carry a disproportionate share of caring responsibilities, reflected in significantly higher rates of parental leave, unpaid leave, carer's leave, and flexible work uptake relative to men. This imbalance has well-established consequences for women's workforce participation, career progression, and long-term earning potential. Notably, men's uptake of parental leave remains lower than their workforce representation would suggest, and age demographic data does not appear to correlate with this differential - raising questions about whether cultural or structural barriers are influencing men's decisions to access available entitlements.
Additionally, gender equality considerations are not yet fully integrated into all organisational systems, processes, and regular reporting cycles. Where gender equity is not built into existing decision-making frameworks - including performance and development processes, remuneration decisions, and workforce planning - it risks being deprioritised or overlooked. Sustaining progress on gender equality requires it to be visible and actively considered as a routine part of organisational practice, rather than treated as a standalone or periodic focus area.
Finally, while data is inconclusive due to changes to the definition of senior leadership and the organisation's evolving leadership model, the gender composition of senior leadership warrants ongoing monitoring to ensure it is not contributing to gender inequality at the VGSO given current composition reflects a gender imbalance relative to the broader workforce profile.
Updated